Follow by Email

Sunday, April 3, 2011


Feel free to answer the poll question:

How many of these descriptions of delusion best apply to what you
read of Rosemary Ainslie's daily proclamations on the internet?

 - a fixed belief opposed to reality and not logically sound.
 - a false belief that is maintained in spite of contrary evidence.
 - a false belief that is resistant to confrontation with actual facts.
 - unfounded and irrational beliefs held despite contrary evidence.
 - a fixed belief that is either false, fanciful, or derived from deception.
 - a firm belief in something untrue despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
 - a persistent or dominating false conception regarding matters of fact,
   and which is resistant to reason.

376 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 376 of 376
Anonymous said...

If Rossi publishes your rubbish, then good for you. However, what credibility does Rossi have? Obviously very little if he indeed makes that mistake.

Rose, Rose, Rose, must you be ALWAYS reminded?; YOUR MEASUREMENTS ARE WRONG!

.99

Anonymous said...

Today I remembered the name Rosemary Ainslie from 7 years ago, typed the name in Google, and this blog is one of the first things that popped up.

It was obvious that there was never anything to her circuit, then or now. She was exposed as a fraud years ago. Today at almost 70 years old, all she does is look for personal attention. No one ever took her fantasies seriously.

Not one person will remember a word this loser ever wrote when she's dead and gone and the internet will speed up again. She never had anything to say, ever had a cogent thought, and never accomplished a thing in her life.

That's your obit old lady ..you wrote it yourself.

Anonymous said...

Rosemary,

You apparently have far FAR too much time on your hands. You ought be using that time wisely to properly educate yourself in matters technical so that you may straighten out those nonsensical theories of yours. They're desperately in want of a complete re-write!

.99

Anonymous said...

We are all so happy that you read here Rosemary. It gives you your "attention" quota for the week. So don't you find it interesting that none of YOUR TROLLS as you call them are saying anything about Rossi? Maybe its because he has something and is not full of empty words and lies like you have done? And BTW there are many forums/blogs that have been discussing the Rossi stuff for almost a year now. And a weekly Skype show with many from around the world have been in deep discussions and in contact with Rossi for about the same time. You just have not been invited to the table it seems. So you can still be what you call yourself a Troll Slayer but you don't need to protect Rossi. He really has something.

Anonymous said...

Merry Christmas Rosemary.

Where the fuck is your circuit
that runs on free energy?

Anonymous said...

Seems Rosemary, that you would do yourself a huge favour to restrain from commenting. Evidently, you didn't understand my comments about putting you and Aaron into the same category when it comes to science (and apparently simple comprehension too).

You erroneously jumped to the conclusion (as you always do) that I stated you supported Aaron's ridiculous notion that a bouncing ball is OU. Not so. I was stating that you two are in the same category of self-professed subject matter experts, when in fact you both have no clue whatsoever regarding those subjects.

Your measurements are, and always have been WRONG. Your interpretations of those measurements are WRONG.

Face the facts Rosemary, your work will never get off the ground, because your work is completely flawed.

.99

Anonymous said...

What is your constant fixation on Harvey Gramm? I have not heard him say anything about you in over a year and you still can't stop talking about him. Do you have some unresolved issues Rosemary? Do you suffer from " Unrequited Love?" You poor neglected woman. Give us all a break will you?

The Boss said...

Rosemary Ainslie asks if it is important to maintain this blog: The answer is Yes.

This is a safe haven for the general public to freely express their views without fear of attack or censorship.

Her threads will die soon after she is gone, but this blog will be here forever, as a record and reminder of her inability to grasp reality in her lifetime and the earned reputation she left behind.

Anonymous said...

You all are talking about a woman in her 70's who's had psychological problems all her life, with a highest completed education level of high school.

She gonna teach me something new?

C'mon Man!

Cyrus from Chicago

Anonymous said...

She would be about 63 or 64 years old right now. She's not in her 70's yet.

.99

Anonymous said...

I stand corrected .99

On what planet does a university accept a thesis from a high school graduate?

C'mon Man!

Cyrus from Chicago

Anonymous said...

I don't think any university, nor anyone for that matter has accepted or published any paper she has submitted.

I doubt this Rossi fellow will publish her nonsense either, but who knows for sure?

It's painful to watch as she embarrasses herself on OU while debating with gravityblock. She's really a hopeless case.

.99

Anonymous said...

No Rosemary, I did not ever say you were in love with Harvey.

In fact, I'd have to say the only person you seem to be in love with is yourself.

.99

Anonymous said...

Rosemary,

Unfortunately for you, but fortunately for the OU community, you are not in a position to dictate the terms and conditions for claiming the overunity prizes. Each site has their own rules, and they are clear enough. Your frequent and ever-so-familiar "bulldoze over everyone" approach is transparent to most I trust, so it's a wonder you keep trying the same nonsense.

Your work is severely flawed and you've refused all offers to correction. It's utterly amazing that you feel you are in a position to preach about how others have no idea when it comes to power measurement (a previous blog post of yours), yet you are one of the worst offenders of proper measurement protocol the community has ever seen.

Get real and cease with all the nonsense. Roll Eyes

.99

Anonymous said...

And now in the very early 2012 we are starting off the year with ONCE AGAIN.....NERD

N ever
E nding
R osemary
D rama

Rosemary has put on her big girl panties and demanding that she get prize money for her COP INFINITY. Does she realize how laughable her demand is? I guess not.

Anonymous said...

...just another "fantasy of the day".

Anonymous said...

Well one thing Rosie says that's correct .... her stuff is (Quote) substantial and replicable.

This creation is done daily by countless individuals, but just like myself we give that toilet a good flush and get rid of the smelly thing.

The problem being that stuff just keeps coming back day after day .....

.

Anonymous said...

Rosemary Ainslie

Your post today clearly demonstrates that you have no fucking idea what you are talking about.

.

Anonymous said...

Anyone got a copy of the deleted post ? sounds like a good read above and beyond the usual comedy!

Anonymous said...

It was a LONG post attacking those who comment on Poynt's forum right now. She was breaking up comments as to "why" each one is utter drivel and that SHE is correct. So as her comments go it was alot of BLAH BLAH and more BLAH. Funny how she thinks THIS is a Hate thread. What she says is hateful.

Anonymous said...

I have just read post #227 on Rosemary's blog... It is not only Ohms law she has no basic understanding of!

The errors in this post are so fundamental that I believe there is no hope for her.

The previous poster here was right:

Rosemary Ainslie

Your post #227 clearly demonstrates that you have no fucking idea what you are talking about.

The Boss said...

Today I asked a good friend of mine what he thought of Rosemary Ainslie.

He responded with a brilliant one word description.

Counter-intelligence.

The Boss

Anonymous said...

This morning I took my boyfriend's multimeter and measured my car battery. It read +12.5 volts.
I reversed the 2 probes and it read -12.5 volts. According to Rosemary my car is an overunity device.

I'm going to write a thesis after lunch.

Margaret from Australia

Anonymous said...

Brilliant Margaret! You've cracked Rosemary's secret!

Let me know when your thesis is done, and I'll post it at OUR. Perhaps Mr. Rossi would be interested in publishing it in his JBS?

.99

Anonymous said...

There has been new developments on Rosemary's NERD ENERGY RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT (link) with a new forum avatar logo for the STANDARD "TURD" MODEL device that is claimed by her to have INFINATE "COP"

.

Anonymous said...

Quote from Rosemary today:

"I have no CLUE if anything that I write is even vaguely comprehensible. And I would LOVE to make this clear."

You have been making it perfectly clear for 10 years that you have no idea of what you're talking about.

You live in a lonely world of your own fantasies.

Anonymous said...

The IEEE is well aware of this "phenomenon" of parasitic oscillation in paralleled MOSFET's.

Here is a paper from Jul 1984:

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F16%2F31904%2F01483922.pdf%3Farnumber%3D1483922&authDecision=-203

And another from 2006:

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1645505

Maybe this helps explain why the 5th submission by Rosemary of her "thesis" was rejected, the bin was full with the previous 4.

Anonymous said...

For those interested in seeing what a proper paper on this subject looks like, written by someone who knows what they are talking about, here you go:

Paralleling of Power MOSFETs for Higher Power Output

by James B. Forsythe, Member IEEE

http://www.irf.com/technical-info/appnotes/para.pdf

and another:

Parallel Connection of Power Electronic Devices

by Jonathan Dodge, P.E.
Senior Applications Engineer
Advanced Power Technology

http://www.sz-sunny.com/APT/application%20note/apt0202.pdf

Some of you may now understand why "Rosemary's thesis" is widely regarded amongst those in the know, as not fit for purpose.

Anonymous said...

nul-points:

--- Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on March 31, 2011, 07:42:00 AM ---added

Just had a diagnosis. 2 of the MOSFETs blown. Interestingly it's enough to block that oscillation.

--- End quote ---


looks like that link was correct about possible damage to the MOSFETS

wonder if it's correct about the other 2 things i picked out from it, too?

http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg279486/#msg279486

all the best
np

A quote from Rosemary's own blog:

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/03/report.html

1 FIRST TEST
1.1 Circuit description
The experimental apparatus comprises a simple switching circuit (see Figure 1). 6 x 12 volt lead acid batteries are in series with both a heating element (RL1) and 5 MOSFET transistors (Q1) in parallel.

As everyone can see Rosemary Ainslie is a pathological liar and cannot avoid engaging in pathological science:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_science

Pathological science is the process by which "people are tricked into false results ... by subjective effects, wishful thinking or threshold interactions". The term was first used by Irving Langmuir, Nobel Prize-winning chemist, during a 1953 colloquium at the Knolls Research Laboratory. Langmuir said a pathological science is an area of research that simply will not "go away"—long after it was given up on as 'false' by the majority of scientists in the field. He called pathological science "the science of things that aren't so".

Anonymous said...

A quote from Rosemary's blog #230 dated January 20, 2012:

"OUR REQUIRED Q-ARRAY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRANSISTORS IN PARALLEL"

A quote from overunity.com reply #244 while in discussion with .99 dated January 21, 2012:

"It is IMPOSSIBLE to use standard circuit representations as per our ACTUAL MOSFET - Q-Array as we refer to it. The closest way to describe the configuration is this.

There are two MOSFETS in parallel."

A pathological liar in action.

Res ipsa loquitur!

Anonymous said...

Re: last comment.

I saw that too, as I'm sure lots of others did.

Its been obvious for years that this woman's mind
is permanantly wired as a short circuit.

Lying about her lies is part of her behaviour and is natural to her.

The thing that everyone in every forum can say for sure is that they have all been able to to witness an actual crazy woman in thier lifetime.

LWK

Anonymous said...

Rosemary

Thousands of people have read your words over the years. You even continue to harass people privately, including me.

After reading one or two of your posts, or having one or two interactions with you, you are correctly viewed by, not only myself but, the general public as being mentally imbalanced and offer nothing to demonstrate otherwise. I, for one, will ignore you.

Do you not see yourself for what you are ?

Anonymous said...

In "perspective" the real problem being the owner and moderator of Over Unity dot com "Stefan Hartman" he is actually as much to blame for the continued lies and deception to the open source community as Rosemary Ainslie.

Stefan Harman has given Rosemary a protected platform to publish her fraudulent discoveries and give false hope to those that are uneducated in the technology forum members and readers.

Stefan Hartman is giving total backing and credence to cobbled up devices, schematics, data collection process, theory and claims of something that cannot be proven by any of the methods used and described by Rosemary Ainslie.

What does this tell us about Stefan Hartman ??? What about those continued fraudulent claims published in Stefans forum on a daily basis, what has he to gain but discrediting his forum maybe money, fame or glory ??

Rosemary Ainslie has only one place to go on the internet and that's to Over Unity dot com with Stefan Hartman's blessing and protection of the "FRAUD" and mentally disterbed Rosemary Ainslie.


.

Anonymous said...

I completely agree with the previous comment.

Stefan Hartmann has failed to moderate overunity.com in a responsible manner.

Rosemary Ainslie has been proven to be a compulsive liar. She has insulted many members of the free energy community via her private blog, but continued to be allowed to post on overunity.com, and not challenged on the fraudulent statements she makes. Her thesis is fatally flawed, in violation of the scientific method, and backed only with junk science.

She has been allowed to make continuous demands for payment of the overunity prizes despite not meeting the criteria or presenting any credible evidence of an overunity result. Not to mention the complete absence of even one independant reproduction that validates her claims.

It has become obvious that Stefan allows her to use his platform to increase traffic to the site and therefore increase his advertising revenue. Money appears to be his primary goal, and not scientific integrity.

Unfortunately the situation is bleak for the free energy community. Aaron has shown he has no understanding of overunity with his bouncing ball nonsense, and Stefan has slipped into disgrace.

Only .99 has shown himself to be both competent and honourable, and his forum OUR remains the most respectable despite the lowest number of people traffic.

Anonymous said...

Stefan Hartmann needs to be a man and make a simple decision. Either ban her, or publicly embrace her and give her the prize money without any evidence. He is allowing her to shit on him again and on his forum just like last time. Why does he allow her to make a mockery of him and his forum? He told everbody on his forum the rules she had to follow in order to be reinstated and she has been breaking those rules right in front of his face. He said it before; she has her own blog to make her speeches and trash people. This guy needs to stand up and make a decision: Give her the money now
or throw her out.

After all these years in four forums with combined memberships in the thousands there are one or two people who agree with her. All the rest who disagree with her; she attacks, trashes and calls trolls. According to her, 99% of the public are trolls including universities, newspapers, scientific bodies, professors, experts and professionals and anybody who may happen to be reading this.

Doesn't she understand that if everyone views her as a complete nut case, there's a pretty good chance that they may be right ?

Anonymous said...

Yep, Stephan is on the take alright he's so excited with the results of his forum member "Woopy" with posting a voltage spike. To bad the device isn't a replication at all of Rosemary's junk with the wrong mosfet and using a DC power supply instead of batteries. The results are skewed because of the function generator inducing voltage and current into the incorrectly designed circuit but Stefan is Rosemary's personal lap puppy and he is still all in with the new results.

Must be nice to have a six figure income from others work. I can see why with the internet traffic going to his web site using bogus devices and documentation from shady individuals like Rosemary not from true experimentalist for his income revenue. I forgot, all of the really good inventors and experimentalist left because of Stefan rules and improper forum thread interventions.

.

Anonymous said...

Poor Rosemary thinks that the other comments have been deleted......

Anonymous said...

I really hope that Poynt now finally leaves the conversation with her so that she can now instruct the new guy, Woopy, how to build her circuit. She doesnt have a clue how as to how her own circuit works and will have some fancy explaining to do when the guy demonstrates that he cant get it to do what she is saying it does.

Poynt has proven her wrong twice now. Now its time for the new guy to do the same, after which she will soon be trashing him as well.

This conversation should now be just between Rosemary and Woopy.

This is it folks:
COP INFINITY right before your eyes !!

Anonymous said...

The onus has always been laid on a claimant to provide proof of their claim. PROOF. No one else bears any burden of responsibility to disprove it.

Not one person has come forward in 10 years to state that these claims have any validity. They have been rejected by every institution, group and individual, for lack of a provision of proof.
Words borne of fantasy do not constitute proof.
A rejected claim is otherwise known as a fraudulent claim.

The only proof that Rosemary has been able to consistantly demonstrate is her inablity to distinguish between fantasy and reality.

PhiChaser said...

Awww, you guys! She's just a nice old lady... (Oh man, why did I tell her my name? Heh heh...) Looks to me like she isn't measuring her circuit properly either but you really can't tell this woman anything can you?? Funny as hell reading Poynt99 and Rosie bang heads... She can a bit frustrating, I can see that...Hell, I get called that on a weekly basis! ;)

Anonymous said...

One thing that really puzzles me, is that the RATS (Rosemary Ainslie's Team of Scientists)in their apparent content, idly stand by while Rosemary makes not only a complete fool of herself, but fools of the Team as well.

So we can only make one of two conclusions:
1) Either the RATS are as deluded and ignorant of what they are doing as Rosemary is, OR

2) There is no team of scientists.

Either way, it's a sad situation.

.99

Anonymous said...

Your right .99, it is a sad situation indeed.

Your two options for the RATS team are the only possibilities I see also. I love the way they are no longer "experts" but have morphed into "collaborators". I think it is obvious "why"!

Rosemary has said that she developed the magnetic field model, then constructed a circuit to test the theory, incompetently put the circuit together and "discovered" the "oscillation" that proved her field theory, by accident. If that does not set your bullshit detector off, then you need to get it calibrated!

Unfortunately, Rosemary has discovered that by launching public attacks on prominent members of the OU community she can have continued dialogue indefinately, and as she has said she is prepared to argue her case for years, so she will never go away as long as she has a public platform to speak on. Her own blog as you all know is locked for public comment and a one way discussion only.

It is interesting that she has dropped the overunity prize claim against Stefan Hartmann, while continuing the public attack on both yourself and Professor Jones for not paying up (rightly so IMO). It sure looks like a deal has been struck behind the scenes between Stefan and Rosemary for continued use of his platform to promote her fraudulent claims. It looks like Stefan has become a RAT collaborator.

Anonymous said...

Reply #455 on: Today at 07:01:26 PM

Dear Rosemary Ainslie,

I am under No obligation to afford you the OUR Award for which you have half-heartedly applied. Why? Your application does not meet the terms and conditions as outlined at OUR, nor does it provide convincing evidence of your claim. In fact, the evidence presented in the application supports the assertion that the measurements are erroneous.

Your circuit has been replicated with a computer simulation program called SPICE, for which it is impossible to obtain erroneous measurements of actual power used. Your measurement errors have been replicated in the program, and it has been explained in great detail how the measurement error was achieved. Furthermore, several measurements were given which support the fact that your measurement as submitted, exhibits not only the incorrect polarity, but incorrect amplitude as well.

Therefore, your persistence to demand award of any prize regarding your claim is simply futile. That you don't take to heart the damning evidence before you, is irrelevant; the circuit presented does NOT exhibit OU, nor COP=Infinity, nor any such notion....period!

.99

Reply #458 on: Today at 08:44:38 PM

All we require - at this stage of our 'discussion' is an acknowledgement that our measurement protocols are correct and sufficient for proof of our claim - with or without that second test with the single FET and no function generator. There is nothing else to discuss.

Regards,
Rosemary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusion

"A delusion is a belief held with absolute conviction despite superior evidence.[1] Unlike hallucinations, delusions are always pathological (the result of an illness or illness process)"

Anonymous said...

This comment is for Bubba, as it may be a genuine enquiry for clarification on this subject, if there is such a thing.

I have no desire to be included in Rosemary's upcoming list of insults, which I am sure she is preparing now as part of her final closing statement. I am posting here to avoid that fate.

The index page:

http://amasci.com/miscon/elect.html

The main page:

http://amasci.com/miscon/eleca.html#frkel

Particularly important pages:

http://amasci.com/miscon/voltage.html

http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/amateur/elecdir.html

Hopefully that will help you Bubba, and if it does not, it might help someone else.

Peace.

Anonymous said...

I forgot to list this as an important page:

http://amasci.com/miscon/nitpik.html

Read this first before the other's and it will help set the context. It should also help explain a wasted decade of effort by a global community trying to explain things to a person who does not understand the subject, but thinks they do.

Peace.

Anonymous said...

Now you have had a chance to absorb the above information lets see how it applies to a battery:

http://www.av8n.com/physics/anode-cathode.htm

So as you can see it becomes extremely complicated to analyse these circuits at all, especially when a battery bank is involved. Rosemary's papers certainly do not make the grade for study by the "academic community", not even close!

Additionally .99 has replicated Rosemary's eroneous "overunity measurements" in SPICE, which would not be possible if it was truly demonstrating overunity results. This was highlighted by Stefan Hartman, who stated that SPICE would not be accurate in analysing an overunity situation. How right he was, Rosemary's "circuit" is not an overunity situation!

So let's have a look at this:

http://www.instructables.com/id/AmpHourTest/

As you can see this is a simple test that a kid could perform, so there is a huge question mark as to why this test has been REPEATEDLY REFUSED, despite Rosemary's constant bullshit about never refusing a reasonable test.

Peace.

Anonymous said...

In addition to this pathetic 60 year old high-schooler being pathologically afflicted,
as evidenced by her 10 year continuous babble,
her 10 year record has permanently sealed what people think of her both in and out of the open source community.

Most people end up ignoring her after realizing that the delusions never stop, nor will they ever.

Good for Stefan for making money off her sickness.
Here in America we call guys like him a pimp.

Anonymous said...

Rosemary Ainslie has personally given a new definition to STUPID , and the American phrase of Dumb as "DIRT" has a additional new and better meaning now !!!

.

Anonymous said...

Watching Poynty take her apart is hilarious. She has not got a clue of what she is talking about, or the slightest awareness of how stupid she looks trying to talk technical.

I think stupid is an understatement, batshit crazy is far more accurate!

Anonymous said...

Poynt is not required to disprove anything.
The burden of proof rests with Rosemary.

Someone remind her that she cant cross the Canadian border wearing pyjamas.

Anonymous said...

Rosemary,

Regarding the generator, it seems that your position is that the generator is unable to pass any significant amount of current, and that of others (99&MH)is that current will flow.

I suggest the following:

Disconnect the generator output (the generator "+" lead in your schematic, and connect it to one terminal of a 7 watt or so 120V bulb (Christmas tree bulb, etc). Touch the other bulb terminal to the positive end of your battery bank.

If the bulb lights, current flows through the gen, if not, then no significant current flows through the gen. It would take longer to find the bulb than to do this test to prove all that opposition wrong.

Stick with a low wattage (5-10 watt) for an initial test.

The Boss said...

This blog is not a message board for Rosemary Ainslie. If you have technical issues you wish to discuss or bring forward to her, kindly do so at Overunity.com, Overunity Research.com, or leave her a personal message on her blog where she will address you. This is not the appropriate place.

Thank you.

Anonymous said...

To "The Boss",

My apologies, I see now that this site is only for polling "a public reality check", wherein criticising, denegration, and name calling directed at Rosemary is apparently its intended purpose.

That is not my nature nor was it my intent.

Please forgive me. I will move on.

The Boss said...

Thank you and very best wishes for your discourse with Rosemary. You will be well received provided you agree with every word she says.

This is a place made up of people who are aware of, and have previously shared a part of a long history with Rosemary Ainslie. Most here have long ago reached their conclusions with regard to her. Perhaps you will be back in the future, in which case you are always welcome.

Anonymous said...

"Anonymous said...

To "The Boss",

My apologies, I see now that this site is only for polling "a public reality check", wherein criticising, denegration, and name calling directed at Rosemary is apparently its intended purpose.

That is not my nature nor was it my intent.

Please forgive me. I will move on."


Reading through this blog site for a few minutes appears to be sufficient for you to cast judgement on those that post here. If you would be so kind as to read through the many, many threads, on many different sites (which Rosemary has been banned from) over more than 10 years (millions of words), would you then be kind enough to come back and let us know how you feel about the abuse Rosemary has dished out to many, many people, for simply disagreeing with her.

Anonymous said...

Here you go Rosemary, this is for you, enjoy!

Lessons In Electric Circuits - Volume 1

Chapter 10 - DC Network Analysis

http://openbookproject.net/electricCircuits/DC/DC_10.html

I think you owe Poynty an apology!

Anonymous said...

Rosemary has been telling eveyone that polarity doesnt matter, yet every time I put batteries in my alarm clock or flashlight the opposite way, they never work.

Maybe all these people who make things that operate on batteries have it all wrong.

Margaret from Australia

Anonymous said...

Rosemary is her own worst enemy. She howls and complains that people are ruining her "good name", but the fact is that she destroys her own credibility every time she makes a post.

She does a far better job at making herself look foolish than I ever could.

How could she expect ANYONE to ever take her seriously?

.99

Anonymous said...

This is why:

Pathological Narcissism, Psychosis, and Delusions

http://samvak.tripod.com/journal91.html

She needs professional help, no doubt about it.

Anonymous said...

"Reading through this blog site for a few minutes appears to be sufficient for you to cast judgement on those that post here. If you would be so kind as to read through the many, many threads, on many different sites (which Rosemary has been banned from) over more than 10 years (millions of words), would you then be kind enough to come back and let us know how you feel about the abuse Rosemary has dished out to many, many people, for simply disagreeing with her."

In no way did I mean to "cast judgement". I was merely making an observation from the read. I mistakenly thought it was a more technical thread gone astray, as often happens.

I am fully aware of the "Anslie saga", from the very beginning and through all the various arguments and personality conflicts.

What's the point? If you truly believe that someone is inflicted with "Pathological Narcissism, Psychosis, and Delusions", do you honesty believe brow beating and denegration will cure such afflictions? Or is it more likely that such behaviour will entrench that person further, or even worse, push them "over the edge". Such discussions are best left to professionals, not armchair psychologists on public forums.

If it is felt that Rosemary needs "teaching", then "teach". Lead the horse to water, if it won't drink, you've done all you can.

We have all likely had those rare teachers in our past that were very good at teaching by example. The light bulb experiment was such an attempt. The link to DC theory could be helpful, but I believe Rosemary needs a more "hands on approach". Did you not all dislike the teachers that quoted you monotone facts and expected you to recall them from memory at test time, without you fully comprehending the concepts?

Personally, I just see no need for anyone to cyberbully anyone. We are who we are and how we act...

.99 for example, has demonstrated a lot of patience over the years, more than I could ever have mustered, but even he gets drawn in to the personality conflicts and arguments at times. Such behviour diminishes us all.

Best wishes...

Anonymous said...

When I read your post I immediately got the impression that you were casting judgement on the people who post here. It was just the way it read, to me, so I said so. No offence intended.

There are some posts here that I do not approve of, and comments that I would personally never make. However, a lot of the comments are about technical observations of why this claim is fraudulent on so many levels, and about all the lies and deceptions Rosemary has engaged in over more than a decade.

It is hard to believe that a fully aware follower of the "Ainslie saga" would be unaware of this blog. However, as the link to this blog when it was first constructed was deleted almost immediately by Stefan Hartmann, and The Boss was banned from overunity.com for posting it, you might have missed it. Strangely the only person ever allowed to post a link to this blog on overunity.com (without being banned) is Rosemary, and that was recently, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt on that one. It is possible you were unaware of it's existence.

Rosemary is clearly suffering from some kind of pathological delusion, this has been obvious for years, the evidence is overwhelming. I am sure a lot of people hope that she get's professional help. Is that likely ? No it is not. She is as deep into denial as she is into delusion, at the very least the community has raised the issue so she is aware of it, which is the only option the community has. Nobody can force her to seek professional help, she has to make that decision for herself.

It is interesting that you talk about cyberbullying. In your opinion is Rosemary guilty of this ? Are you aware of the many extremely abusive posts she has made publicly and privately over many years ?? Many of which were deleted by moderator's or herself because they seriously crossed the line. Are you aware that her NERD thread went dead in it's infancy and the only way she could get it going again was to attack .99 and Professor Jones and *demand* she be paid the prize money for her claim!

I agree that .99 has been extremely patient with her, as have many others. His basic DC circuit was admirable in attempting to "teach" her. I myself posted the link to the DC theory, why ?

I was showing Rosemary that not only are .99's arguments complying with standard scientific convention, but also to give people with little understanding of these subjects some decent material to attempt to undo the damage that reading Rosemary's nonsensical babble will inevitably cause.

There are a lot of young people interested in free energy in general and I suspect that a large majority of them will be hopelessly confused after reading one of Rosemary's threads, not to mention being conditioned via exposure, that her behaviour is acceptable in debating scientific matters.

I also went back to comment #1 tonight and read this entire blog through, to make sure my impression of it was accurate . I finished, and I was sad. This nonsense has been going on for more than a decade now, and the integrity of the open source energy research community is at stake. It is no accident that there are comments going right back to the beginning about Stefan Hartmann. His motives in supporting Rosemary and suppressing people on his site are becoming widely questioned.

This is all very sad.

With respect,

Anonymous said...

You deleted that post quick, any particular reason ?

Anonymous said...

Today in post 535 at OU, amidst much prose, she states the following:

"The irony is this. We were able to PROVE a COP>17."

To a first-time reader this would be very exciting and they may quite well spend the rest of their lives trying to replicate something which those of us here know is a complete lie. It was never proven by anyone anywhere. Those lies cannot go unchallenged.

The fact that she has deep psychological problems does not give her free licence to lie to the unsuspecting novice. ..That's what this place is all about and I'm glad its here.

Anonymous said...

Well, after this latest tirade from Rosemary (I've already given up on communicating with her), I have to say in my books, she has graduated from being antagonistic, narcissistic, deluded, and incorrigible, to just plain "psychotic", teetering on insane.

.99

Anonymous said...

Those who know Rosemary we have seen her over the years beating her chest screaming over-unity on cobbled up devices that don't work.

What has happened is Rosemary has became nothing but a flat chested knobby kneed troll spitting out vial words of wisdom to those that will listen, on a internet soap box supplied by a sniveling pirate named Stefan.

.

Anonymous said...

WISDOM? Thats scarey that you think she has WISDOM...Yeesh

The Boss said...

Step by step, and by matter of fact, her absurd claim of her circuit's infinite COP was systematically dismantled as a fraud by Poynt99.

Exposed for what she is, the "Deluded One" has abandoned her 10 year attempted hoax and moved on to the world of pseudo-science where her psychotic disorder will be most suited.

As she quite correctly concludes describing herself as "afflicted with insufficient schooling and a heavily challenged intellect", her continued babble will be of interest to few.

Anonymous said...

Good Golly....Could it really be so? .
N ow
E nding
R osemary
D rama?

Anonymous said...

It doesn't appear the nonsense is about to end at all.

Too bad Stefan doesn't have the gumption (or the concern regarding his forum's integrity) to do the right thing and give her the public "spanking" that she needs.

It's simply ridiculous what's being posted, and she's now apparently hunting us down in other threads as well.

I think the bottom line now is, that no one gives a damn what she says, hence the indifference to her rhetoric.

.99

Anonymous said...

"I'm anxious to find out how you actually calculate the amount of energy that is delivered by the battery."

PRICELESS!

Anonymous said...

Rosemary is going into edit mode so let's get this down before she realises what she has actually admitted, and deletes it!

"I'm anxious to find out how you actually calculate the amount of energy that is delivered by the battery. Here's our problem. We are applying standard measurement protocols. And for the life of us we cannot find any evidence of any energy at all - being delivered by those batteries. Which leaves us with that rather puzzling anomaly of INFINITE COP. Not easily explained in terms of the standard model - unless, of course, there are measurement errors."

To paraphrase what Rosemary is actually admitting here:

The RATS do not know how to calculate energy delivered by the battery, and therefore have taken no Pin measurements. The RATS cannot find any evidence of any energy being delivered by the battery (because they have not measured it). The RATS have then erroneously concluded that because they have no evidence of energy being supplied by the battery they have INFINITE COP. The RATS then admit a possible explanation is that they have made measurement errors.

Anonymous said...

Ahh...NERD indeed. No, it won't end. Our Rosemary still doesn't grasp the difference between energy and power, still doesn't understand integration, still believes that artefacts are data, and still refuses to perform honest and definitive battery discharge testing. It would be funny if it wasn't so... boring.Frankly I'm surprised to see her still around on stefan's site. I thought that he'd finally had enough of her pestering him "privately". But I guess since he lives on traffic, any traffic is good traffic, even if it's more Ains-lies.--TinselKoala

Anonymous said...

Yet another Rosie Posie fiasco. Rosie is now freaking out over the concept of "negative wattage" and can't seem to wrap her brain around the concept of a "convention."

Then she has a dialog with Lawrence and poor Lawrence gets it backwards.

Rosie Posie, here is the way it works: Power going into a device is called positive power by convention. Power flowing out of a device is called "negative power" by convention. It's as simple as that, and there is no reason to freak out about it.

Take the case of a resistor, you apply voltage and follow the convention and you get positive power. Now if you invert the voltage on the resistor and follow the convention then you still get positive power. i.e.; Power is flowing INTO the resistor and being converted into heat power.

Anonymous said...

Now Rosie Posie, what about a battery? Well, we know that a battery is a device that normally exports power to the outside world. And if you follow the convention that Poynt explained to you you will calculate negative power. The fact that it is "negative" is just telling you that the device is exporting power, and not importing power. Can you wrap your brain around that?

Let's look at the battery again. Supposing the circuit that the battery is powering sometimes results in the current changing direction and flowing into the battery. Sound familiar?

When current is flowing out of the battery you follow the convention and you calculate negative power.

If the circuit pushes current back into the battery as part of some cyclical event you follow the convention and you calculate positive power.

i.e.; Power being pumped back into the battery (like RECHARGING A BATTERY) is positive power.

The net power output from a battery over some cyclical event is the sum of the negative power plus the positive power.

That's how a DSO will crunch numbers and as you can clearly see for a battery the net power over one cycle is most likely going to be negative, but there is a possibility that it could be positive.

And you are having a freak-out over the standard convention for defining the power associated with a circuit element (or network element (i.e.; multiple circuit elements connected together)) like some kind of stark raving mad hyena.

Instead of acting like a pompous ass you should be humble and try to LEARN SOMETHING.

Anonymous said...

Anyway Rosie Posie, think about all of those months that you were "in development" with your latest circuit, dropping hints in the forums every week or two weeks about how something really special was going on and you were seeing over unity.

Only when Poynt found out that your MOSFET circuit was nonsensically connected up (which you originally tried to hide) did you even begin to understand how it actually worked. Needless to say Poynt had to remind you again during this recent round of discussions how it actually worked.

What that means is that over months and months of "development" none of your associates realized that you had a nonsensical MOSFET setup either! With the current flowing THROUGH the function generator itself if your waveform was fully negatively offset, no less!

In essence, it was the blind leading the blind as you and your associates pondered the "magic oscillation." Not one of them nor you youself had a clue as to what was really transpiring with that NONSENSICAL circuit.

So, considering all that, and considering that you were not even capable to discuss the power analysis of a battery powering a single resistor without repeated coaching (you still hadn't grasped the negative wattage and scoffed at it, do you understand now?), considering all that, it's plainly clear that you simply can't discuss electronics and circuits, even at a beginner's level.

You are chasing after a mirage due to MEASUREMENT ERRORS for Christ's sake, that's all it is. And you are a belligerent ass on top of all that which makes matters that much worse.

Give it up Rosie Posie!

MileHigh

P.S.: And NO, I am not revealing my identity considering that some rabid clueless free energy experimenters have paranoid delusions just like you and they are also PACKING GUNS. Fuck that!

Anonymous said...

Hi Last Poster,

Read thru the comments posted here from day one. This is not a technical forum and people dont send messages to Rosemary from here like was pointed out last week.

This is a place to kick back and catch up on her commentary not to read technical stuff. Nobody wants it here. We all know where to go for that.

The other stuff you wrote was real good. Keep it coming.

Margaret from Australia

Anonymous said...

..And I didnt mean you Mike High.

Margaret fronm Australia

Anonymous said...

Hi Margaret,

Thanks for your comments. That was my one and only technical rant and it was indeed for Rosie Pose since she said that she reads here regularly.

It was something to get off of my chest and now all is well. lol

MileHigh

Anonymous said...

MileHigh

Please dont get me wrong. Your post was not technical and was meant for the poster before you.

We're all familiar with you in the forums and the absolutely realistic way in which you see things (most of the time before anybody else).

Margaret from Australia

Anonymous said...

And heaven forbid you would start getting HATE e-mails from her. And Skype messages.
And your info all over her BLOG of lies.


Too many crackpots out there.

Anonymous said...

I have been wondering why Rosemary is not claiming Stefan Hartmann overunity prize? He should post why or WHY NOT she is going after it. And did RR Rabid Rose really think that Rossi was going to publish her papers in his journal?

Anonymous said...

Rosemary wants Professor Jones to comment on Poynty's power analysis.

The Professor clearly says:

"On the previous page, you refer to this "debate" with poynty, but I could not see the link to the debate. In order to understand WHAT you are talking about, this "negative wattage" business, I should like to see the debate details -- Please provide the link."

So does Rosemary provide the link ?

Nope, she cut and pastes a very small section of the debate into the Professor's thread.

She is really losing it big style.

Stefan's lost control of his own forum, but the traffic's increasing! $$$

The Boss said...

I have had one conversation with Stefan via personal message in his forum with regard to prescreening my posts.

He told me he was well aware of this blog even before I emailed him, and advised me that he frequently looks in.

He knows what I think of him in no uncertain terms.

Anonymous said...

The Professor asks Rose to do accurate Pin / Pout measurements using capacitors to conclusively prove her circuit does what she says it does.

The Professor does not appear to know that Rose has run the capacitor tests (Pin anyway, the circuit used up it's available power too rapidly making Pout pointless) and the result conclusively proved that her circuit is UNDERUNITY!

Rose will only discuss the negative wattage result from her scope because it is the only argument she can spin to an uneducated audience, and judging by the quality of scientific reply from her very few supporters, she has convinced them!

You thought about selling snake oil Rose ? I have the feeling you would do well in that profession.

Anonymous said...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watt

The Watt, The unit, defined as one joule per second.

1 Watt = 1 Joule per Second

So "Watts per Second" as quoted by Rosemary actually means:

1 Watt per Second = (1 Joule per Second) per Second

= 1 Joule per Second per Second

= 1 Joule (Second ^ 2)

Rosemary has the audacity to claim that .99 uses incorrect terminology!

Please do not chastise me for a technical discussion, Margaret from Australia, I just cannot resist poynting out how deluded Rose is, no matter how she tries to spin it! ;)

Anonymous said...

BREAKING NEWS:

RAT collaborator Steve Windisch has climbed out of Sterling Allan's ass for long enough to grab a breath and take a pop at .99 (Rose's credibility must really be struggling!)

We are about to witness a battle of the Titan's!

In the Blue corner with 27 years experience in electronics and years of sound documented case history regarding Rosemary Ainslie and her circuit we have .99

In the Red corner with Over 25 years with Fortune 500 corps in the field of Electronics (17 of them in Test and Measurement and Instrumentation) and a history of anonymous public collaboration and support for Rosemary Ainslie we have WilbyInebriated

Let's have a clean fight please gentlemen, hard facts not nitpicking!

Anonymous said...

Totally forgot about the "IMP" TROLL Wilby. Rosemary drew such a neat picture of her and Wilby together about a year ago and posted it in one of the forums. Would love for Rosie to bring that sketch in her thread or blog. That picture was worth a thousand Rosemary words....

The Boss said...

To readers of this blog:

I spend very little, if any, time in maintaining this blog. The blog has a spam filter which automatically deletes posts which are lengthy or otherwise contains malware.

I noticed a post dated Feb 3 in the spam folder and have just reposted it for the benefit of author.

Anonymous said...

If WilbyInebriated is Steve Windisch that's really rich if it's true.

This is the stupid idiot that wrote a op-ed article using word for word Rosemary Ainslie's preconceived device sales pitch. Steve Windisch didn't check a single fact that Rosemary told him to see if it was true or not, when the real facts came out in Rosemary's own words contradicting herself, Steve was no where to be found. From what I recall in forum postings he was even asked to revise the op-ed article with the total truth he wouldn't and just disappeared.

Steve's showing up now is really questionable on his motives or is it just to save face if that's even possible.

WilbyInebriated ..... hahahahaha that's more than funny what a troll !!!

.

Anonymous said...

Quoting Reply #594 in OU yesterday to the Professor:

"We have a circuit that generates a ROBUST self-sustaining oscillation that persists for the duration that a battery is entirely disconnected from the circuit."

Show us, you fucking psychotic!! Just show us.

Anonymous said...

"I'll set up the required controls. I'll re-run the test by 'swapping batteries'. I'll do this a 3rd time IF required - SUBJECT ONLY TO THIS.

That Professor Emeritus Steven E Jones find us 2 or even 3 EXPERTS in electrical engineering - to CONFIRM that this test is then conclusive subject obviously to a close description of the test vs the control - and to the comparative values of both tests.

That those academics are prepared to stake their reputations on the outcome - which means that the monitoring of these results will need the added supervision of someone HERE IN SOUTH AFRICA - who will be considered a credible witness to those results.

I think that Professor would be able to find us some candidates for this endorsement as its likely he has some colleagues in the engineering department. And those colleagues will likely know someone here is a SA academy - who may then 'adjudicate' those tests.

Failing which, UNFORTUNATELY - both Poynty and Professor will simply have to concede our claim by DEFAULT. Or alternatively they must acknowledge our protocols and then witness a demonstration. I see no other viable option. And if NONE of these options are considered then we'll call on them both to 'cough up' that prize money - or those coins - or both - as we've WON BY DEFAULT. We're rather keen on getting some transfer of ownership here."

Kindest regards,
Rosie.

WHY WON'T YOUR OWN EXPERTS STAKE THEIR OWN REPUTATIONS ?

Anonymous said...

Here is my vote for the RATS NERD testing on Rosemary's "QUOTE" -

That those academics are prepared to stake their reputations on the outcome - which means that the monitoring of these results will need the added supervision of someone HERE IN SOUTH AFRICA - who will be considered a credible witness to those results.

Professor Dr Mohamed Tariq Kahn
Head: Centre for Distributed Power & Electronic Systems
Faculty of Engineering
Cape Peninsula University of Technology - South Africa
P.O. Box 1906
Bellville
7535
Telephone no. +27 (0)21 9596208
Fax no. +27 (0)21 9596117
email khant@cput.ac.za

(PDF link) DESIGN OF AN INDUCTION HEATING DOMESTIC WATER HEATER
SYSTEM


The PDF link says it all, this is the man !! There's no where else like the location of Rosemary's demonstation that happend for the basis of her claimed results.

.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Kahn has said that she rented some closet space from them and paid some kids to help her during lunch and after school to put together a circuit board to play with. He said she HAS NOT developed anything and she is not to be using their names or the school in anything she writes or speaks about.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

THIS IS A E-MAIL FROM THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT CPUT WHERE ROSEMARY DID HER "WORK"


As stated to you previously (or I am not sure who?), I have nothing to do with either Rosemarie or her circuit. She is a pleasant and very nice lady in the few times I met her on visiting our Campus but I have not worked with, assisted, nor been involved in any evidentiary claims or counter claims of COP, Zippon or any such theories of creating "something out of nothing". I was skeptical of the claims. As for Donovan Martin, I do not know him as one of our students presently, although he was a student at CPUT about 10 years ago. As far as I know he runs his own company. Thus if she claims any involvement with CPUT, it is not via me. Perhaps you should enquire who is assisting her at CPUT if she makes such claims?

Professor Dr Mohamed Tariq Kahn
Head: Centre for Distributed Power & Electronic Systems
Faculty of Engineering
Cape Peninsula University of Technology
P.O. Box 1906
Bellville
7535

May 19, 2011 5:01 AM

Anonymous said...

Its very sad that I heard Rosemary drove a young man to commit sucide many years ago when he tried to help her with her circuit in the beginnings.

Anonymous said...

I got an idea Rose:

WHY DON'T YOU JUST FUCK OFF!

Nobody gives a SHIT about you, or your bullshit circuit, no academics, no experts, no laymen, no engineers, nobody.

So why don't you take the hint and FUCK OFF!

Anonymous said...

You know, I think her NERDY thread would have dried up until she started harassing .99 and Physics Prof and Stefan for the overunity prize. I think everyone was waiting for Stefan to finally speak up to Rosemary and stop her lying but for some reason ( $$$$$$$$$$ ) he is still letting her BABBLE on or as she says "Rabbit" on. Same difference. Both utterly annoying.

Anonymous said...

Her NERD thread died shortly after birth. Stefan failed to act and his reputation went down the toilet to join hers. She has already let the cat out the bag saying she is planning "circuit 4" which will be back on overunity.com later this year (despite her bullshit about going private only).

Serious experimenters are leaving Stefan's site in numbers, the damage is done, he will be left with a site promoting scams and idiots with no clue.

Anonymous said...

The fact that everyone but her knows that she exists in a pathological blackhole should not preclude anyone from sending her a personal Valentine's Day greeting:

ainslie@mweb.co.za

Anonymous said...

The fact that everyone but her knows that she exists in a pathological blackhole should not preclude anyone from sending her a personal Valentine's Day greeting:

Maybe her son James Ainslie doesn't know about that pathological blackhole, better add him too :

james@CLUE.CO.ZA

Anonymous said...

From what I've been able to ascertain, one of the RATS is an IT professional (Donovan), one is an electrician, and one does web design. I'm not sure about the other two.

Hardly a team of "scientists" or "experts" by any stretch!

With all that electronics firepower, no wonder they're making me look like a newbie; LOL.

.99

Anonymous said...

Gravityblock joins Rosemary's thread and says he is in agreement with some portions of Rosemary's thesis. He then goes on to say that the issues he has raised must be resolved before the device can be measured correctly. All the trouble for years has been caused because Rosemary refuses to admit she has measured the device incorrectly, or take any action to make alternate measurements and verify her results!

AbbaRue then joins the thread with a document on negative resistance circuits from a Berkeley Professor (very interesting by the way), and goes on to say that he has replicated Rosemary's circuit and it performed underunity, but at a higher efficiency level than running the load on direct DC from the battery. However as no load power consumption data for either method was measured, the conclusions are invalid. The assumption is made that the Halogen bulb consumed the same power under both conditions and nothing more. Both tests did however perform underunity.

Between them they say that the circuit is not being measured correctly, and it performs underunity. Both these developments are very strange IMO.

Anonymous said...

Quote from Rosemary today at OU:

"I was in the process of explaining all this when I was broadsided by the unexpected though partial endorsement by Gravock for our thesis. No sooner was that managed than AbbaRue proposed to take the circuit seriously."

Rosemary notes the partial endorsement for her thesis by Gravock and completely ignores him saying the circuit is not measured correctly.

Rosemary then notes that AbbaRue proposed to take the circuit seriously without noting that he also said he replicated the circuit and it performed UNDERUNITY. She also fails to note his rush to conclusion without any load energy dissipation data AT ALL.

I cannot say that I am surprised by Rosemary's statements, her ability to pick and choose data in search of a favourable conclusion is well documented.

Anonymous said...

This nonsense has been going on for years. I have lost count of the times people have explained and demonstrated how to calculate power correctly, and what the correct definitions are. Rose refuses to listen or learn and makes the same mistakes over and over again. She has to, because the moment she performs correct calculations the basis for her claims disappears and the delusion ends. To be honest I think most people have lost interest, it is a never ending circle, and nothing productive will ever come of it.

Anonymous said...

The basis for her fraudlent claims will most certainly disappear because they were always baseless but her delusions will never end.

You must not forget that you're dealing with a psychotic here that refuses to seek help.

Anonymous said...

Rosie LOVES her Acronyms.....

Just A Careless Kook As Somebody Says.
JACKASS

Rosemary Under Delusions Eternally
RUDE

Has Avoided Under Going Head Therapy Yesterday
HAUGHTY

Anonymous said...

TinselKoala at OU has all of it exactly right.

Anonymous said...

Rosemary is talking out of both sides of her mouth again on her BLOB.
And yes, you need a ton of prayers to God to forgive all the things you have done to people.

Anonymous said...

@.99
I suggest you not read her blog. But, if you do, just close your eyes, take a deep breath, and go to your "happy place".

Anonymous said...

Since we know how Rosemary likes to go back and remove/edit posts she's made where she puts her foot in her mouth... so I'm preserving this here for posterity.

Here is the entire basis for Rosemary Ainslie's claims of overunity performance in every one of her circuits.

Quoting RA:
"NOW. Let's look at your 'self-runner' demands. We have never recharged those batteries - with one exception. Two caught fire and BOTH were fully recharged. We've had those batteries since January 2010. We've been running them since August 2010. I've now FINALLY checked their rated capacities. They're 40 ampere hours each. We've used 6 of them continually since that time. According to this rating they are each able, theoretically to dissipate 12 volts x 40 amps x 60 seconds x 60 minutes x 1 hour x 6 batteries. That gives a work potential - a total potential output of 10 368 000 JOULES.

According to what has been carefully established it takes 4.18 Joules to raise 1 gram of water by 1 degree centigrade. We've taken a little under 900 grams of water to 82 degrees centigrade. We ran that test for 90 minutes. Then we upped the frequency and took that water up a further 20 degrees to 104. We ran that part of the test for 10 minutes. Ambient was at 16. Joules = 1 watt per second. So. Do the math. 4.18 x 900 grams x (82 - 16) 66 degrees C = 248 292 joules per second x 90 minutes of the test period = 22 342 280 joules. Then ADD the last 10 minutes where the water was taken to boil and now you have 4.18 x 900 grams x (104 - 16) 88 degrees C = 331 156 joules per second x 10 minutes = 3 310 560 Joules. Then add those two values 22 342 280 + 3 310 560 = 25.6 Million Joules. All 5 batteries maximum potential output - available for work - is 10.3 Million Joules. In that test alone the battery outperformed its watt hour rating. And that was just one test. Now. Over the 10 month period that those batteries have been running at various outputs - which, when added to the output on just this one test - then I think its safe to say that the evidence is conclusive. Those batteries have outperformed. They are still at OVER 12 volts EACH. They are all of them still FULLY CHARGED."
--End Quote from Rosemary Ainslie.

So.... anyone can see that her claims of overunity are completely spurious--ALL OF THEM-- since they are based on this kind of "calculation", repeated over and over.

--TinselKoala

Anonymous said...

Gene Kelly got the dirt on Rosie down pat!

Roses supposes her toeses are Roses,
But Roses supposes Erroneously,
Roses she knowses her toeses aren't roses,
As Roses supposes her toeses to be!

Roses supposes her toeses are Roses,
But Roses supposes Erroneously,
A mose is a mose!
A rose is a rose!
A toes is a toes!
Hooptie doodie doodle
Roses supposes her toeses are Roses,
But Roses supposes Erroneously,

Roses supposes Erroneously!
Roses supposes Erroneously!
Roses supposes Erroneously!

- the Central Scrutinizer

Anonymous said...

I think she took the annihilation rather well actually. I was expecting to see her go into one of her "hissy-fits", but alas, she was able to keep her composure...credits to you Rosie Poser.

So she'll go back to talking to herself on her blog again for a while. But wait, she's threatening to post on Rossi's thread at OU. Oh, that might spell trouble. Do try to be a good girl Rosemary, and play nice with the other kids while you're there.

I see Rosemary STILL does not understand how a MOSFET works; she actually thinks that current goes through the Gate? OMG. And I just laugh every time I see her misquoting and/or misinterpreting many of the things I have said, it's simply ludicrous.

It's really too bad that her collaborators didn't or don't have the balls to go head-to-head with me on any issue. I think that speaks volumes as to their complete lack of confidence in their claims AND their ability to argue that claim against someone with the capability to think rationally. Rose is no better. She wouldn't put her house on the line to back up her claim. The way she goes on and on about how they have definitive proof and all, one would think that would be a no-brainer...well perhaps that is the underlying "problem" to begin with. A little short on the type of wits necessary to play ball in this great game.

Well, as much as most of her posts made me feel somewhat ill of stomach, I think I'm going to miss her nonsensical tirades a bit.

But alas, I have confidence that her techno-gibberish will appear somewhere else once again...it's only a matter of time.

Golly, it's going to be fun times when I post my video of her circuit showing the EXACT same measurements she did....ooooh, can't wait! ;)

.99

Anonymous said...

Sorry for the slight indulgence there folks; I just had to have a little bit of fun with this day. ;)

.99

Anonymous said...

@.99

Try working with femtoamps and then tell me gates don't pass current!

But seriously, aside from the entertainment factor, I do not know how you kept your cool as well as you did. I "heard" you tell her where her source current flowed, total denial and deflection. It is a shame she did not make a better attempt to actually learn something.

By the way, as that common gate stage trys to turn on, it will immediately turn itself off due to the drop across Rgen, and then repeat. It would be more difficult to make it not want to oscillate.

Hopefully your upcoming video will demo OU as well!

Best wishes to all...

Anonymous said...

It appears there is a fitting postponement to Rosemary and her fraudulent actions to the open source community.

The long overdue closure of the OU thread on a make believe standard model of a zippernot dark energy device thingamabob you cant see.

To bad for you to get caught red handed in your scam Rosie and the fitting ( link ) IMAGE from right after the thread closure to some flat chested knobby knee troll in high heals down in SA .

Is the tar and feathers a South Africa tribal thing ???

.

The Boss said...

I don't think that all the folks here appreciate the very long history of this. This has gone on for longer than 10 years as some of us here know firsthand.

Just recently over the past 2 years Poynt .99 has daily carried the load and led the way for everyone. Some may recall Humbugger at Poynts' forum at OUR who played an early role in hammering away at this fraud. Contrary to what Rosemary says, it was she who begged Poynt to remove her membership from his forum because she was not able to stand up to the scrutiny of the highly competent individuals that make up the core of that forum. Those pleas are likely still there in the archived thread.

Although most times Poynt was left completely alone at OU to carry the load on his own, credit should be given to the many who stuck with him and to those who recently came along to follow his lead, both at OU, and here in this blog to expose the claims for what they were. You folks should chime in and take credit for your efforts.

This fraudulent claim was appropriately withdrawn by Rosemary on the eve of the anniversary of the Saint Valentines Day Massacre because it failed meet the minimum requirements offered at OU, OUR and the Jones Award. The claims were disproved before they even qualified for consideration. A complete failure.

Rosemary will now move on to threads at OU where her psychotic delusions will be acceptable and more appropriate with no accountability required for anything one might have to say about anything. It is where she belongs.

The claims made by Rosemary Ainslie were proven to be a hoax, but the biggest failure in all this was the failure of her to seek the psychiatric help she most desperately needs.

That is why this blog will remain here.

Anonymous said...

Poynt99 indeed carried the majority of the load and we owe him a debt of gratitude for his professionalism throughout. I believe it was recognised that too many voices offered the opportunity for misdirection and avoidance of the key issues by Rosemary. .99 was the most competent technically, and had the temperament to manage a difficult situation, both requirements in reaching the truth of the claims. He succeeded where many of us failed. We must all reflect on our part in this. I for one, am glad it is over.

While I respect the right to freedom of speech, this situation has highlighted the need for moderation in the forums. When claims of such magnitude are made they must be backed by solid, unarguable proof. When this is avoided at all costs by the claimant, and scientific integrity is at stake, a decision must be made to prevent descent into anarchy. It is a quality issue, and not a quantity issue that the forum moderators, and others in positions of influence, must address.

Now perhaps our time will be free to develop unity and a better tomorrow for this world. Many virtual cold war walls have begun appearing lately and they serve no purpose but to slow development of understanding, and drive experimenters underground. We must each and every one of us address personal and scientific arrogance.

http://www.einsteinshiddenvariables.com/uploads/NewPhysicsGlobalSustainability.pdf

http://academic.keystone.edu/jskinner/Limnology/AnomaliesOfWaterExplanations.htm

The Boss said...

That being said, this blog is now locked.

The Boss said...

With Rosemary resuming her fraudulent claims, this blog has now been re-opened.

Anonymous said...

I guess Stefan needed some more $$$$? She claims she did the tests he asked about but does not have any videos. She never did a 9v battery test... How can Stefan allow her demands about claiming the OU prizes?

Anonymous said...

I have no idea why this nonsense is being restarted. If she had new data, new tests, with all the measurement errors and other suggestions for alternative measurements to verify her claim, then fair enough, something to talk about. But she does not. She has never provided any data for the tests she claims she has done, which in scientific terms is fraud. Remember she is a pathological liar who changes her story to continue the delusion. Remember the 3 flat batteries ? what happened to them ? No data that supported her claim is my guess so quietly stopped talking about it, if she even did the test at all, which I doubt. She has her own blog for making fraudulaent claims, giving her a community public platform to publicise those claims adds respectability to what has not been proven with reliable data. It's a bad joke.

Anonymous said...

Shes asked me to engage in a debate to refute her claims, then when I post a poll asking her audience of 3 what I should do, she backsteps. So, I guess she will rant on and on to herself for a while.

I get a kick out of her post regarding the so-called capacitor test. Wow, who would have thought that the oscillation would die when the batteries were removed? We all thought the capacitor would continue to hold the fort, didn't we?

Good grief

.99

Anonymous said...

The only difference between her and those crazed people that you see babbling on street corners, is that she does it at home all day sitting in her pyjamas on her computer.

In both cases nobody pays attention to her delusions.

Unknown said...

I CAN'T BELIEVE ALL THE STUPID UNEDUCATED WANT TO BE'S THAT HAVE NO FRIGGEN IDEA IN THE WORLD WHAT THEIR TALKING ABOUT IN ANY OR REMOTE INVOLVEMENT WITH THE CONTINUED ROSEMARY AINSLIE FRAUDULENT OU DEVICES

PROOF OF INCOMPETENCE ...
ROSEMARY' diagramatic depiction of Q-array.png ( link )

IRFPG50 Mosfet industrial STANDARD illustrations ....
IRFPG50 Mosfet diagram.JPG (link)
IRFPG50 SPECIFICATIONS PDF (link)


ROSEMARY'S DEMANDING OF A OVER UNITY PRIZE MONEY FROM ANY ONE IS A CRIME AND A ABSOLUTE INSULT TO THE MANY TRUE EXPERIMENTALIST THAT ACTUALLY DO CREDIBLE AND VERIFIABLE RESEARCH LEADING TO DEVELOPMENT OF POSSIBLE DEVICES WITH "MERIT" NOT JUNK THAT WON'T EVEN BE SUITABLE FOR THE WASTE CAN.

WTF No wonder the open source community has no credibility at all in the engineering and academic arena. Look at all Rosemary's referenced authors submitting information thats unchecked and unverified given to everyone as the truth but in all actually it's nothing but trash.

I'm beginning to be totally ashamed at everyone involved in this open source sham, letting lumps of shit like Rosemary Ainslie, Steve Windisch and Stefan Hartmann comments even being heard.

Anonymous said...

Its interesting that Stefan Hartman is at least having some dialog with her but it isn't going any where. She will NEVER do the tests he asks because SHE KNOWS it will be game over. This has wasted too many peoples time for way TOO long. I guess sick people are like that.

Anonymous said...

Rosemary has made a clever play demanding 2 academics go on record stating future tests will be definitive. No academics ever will because it is obviously the longest running fraud in energy research history. No academic would touch her with someone else's!

Anonymous posters have appeared on the scene such as Bob (moron) Smith demanding she be allowed a voice, without demanding that her supporting evidence and protocols adhere to the scientific method for credibility in supporting her claims. She jumped on this like a flash even posting it to her blob, I would not be surprised if Rosemary is Bob Smith, or maybe Bob is one of those other POS known to post under different names. Whomever he is, his opinion is not of scientific value as it has no scientific content!

However you look at it she will never do any more tests because when she does the game is over. Who would trust her results anyway ? She cannot even do basic math and refuses to answer TK because if she does she has to admit that the math backing her claims is incorrect and therefore her claim is fraudulent!

Rosemary has been banned from every other forum for a reason! Stefan is starting to look like a douche being played as he is.

Anonymous said...

Rosemary has made a clever play demanding 2 academics go on record stating future tests will be definitive. No academics ever will because it is obviously the longest running fraud in energy research history. No academic would touch her with someone else's!

Anonymous posters have appeared on the scene such as Bob (moron) Smith demanding she be allowed a voice, without demanding that her supporting evidence and protocols adhere to the scientific method for credibility in supporting her claims. She jumped on this like a flash even posting it to her blob, I would not be surprised if Rosemary is Bob Smith, or maybe Bob is one of those other POS known to post under different names. Whomever he is, his opinion is not of scientific value as it has no scientific content!

However you look at it she will never do any more tests because when she does the game is over. Who would trust her results anyway ? She cannot even do basic math and refuses to answer TK because if she does she has to admit that the math backing her claims is incorrect and therefore her claim is fraudulent!

Rosemary has been banned from every other forum for a reason! Stefan is starting to look like a douche being played as he is.

Anonymous said...

Well all you foolish believers in Rosemary's Ainslie continued fraudulent "CRIME" against the world.

So a soldering Iron is referenced now as another of your COP INFINITY devices .....

rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011 #1396 (link)
QUOTE
I need to remind you Poynt.99 that this test of ours is replicated on the following variation. 1 battery - used - same supply used to generate the charge for the switch - THEREFORE no functions generator - NO long wires on that test - NO grounding issues - same evident zero voltage discharge - and temperature over the iron resistor at 240 degrees which was hot enough to vaporise solder.

Humm .... no 555 timer mentioned or used it was a direct connection, I wonder what was the duty cycle.

Vaporized the "LEAD SOLDER" .... WOW .... 361.4 °F is the melting point the Boiling point is 3180 °F and "VAPORIZATION" is 179.5 KJ·mol−1 ..... incredible !!!

NO WONDER THERE'S IS NO PROOF AT ALL ANYWHERE OF THIS SOLDERING IRON EXPERIMENT IT WAS SO HOT IT TOTALLY VAPORIZED THE WHOLE THING AND NOTHING WAS LEFT LIKE COMPONENTS, DOCUMENTATION, DATA FILES, OSCILLOSCOPE SCREEN SHOTS ARE ALL GONE !!!

Now you see it now you don't !!!

Sorry Stefan the jokes on you .... sorry I mean you are the joke !!! hahahahah !!!!

Anonymous said...

Check out FuzzyTomCat's recent post #19 which is a good summary of the last decade!

http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/7463-dark-energy-new-scienced-rosemary-ainslie.html

"Rosemary has not been able to prove nothing at all on the "CLAIMS" she has made on all her OU devices.

This is all for a thesis she has cobbled up and has made fictitious devices to substantiate her claim to justify the thesis and is actually "DEMANDING" prize money from several forums based on her personal unproven "CLAIMS".

A SAD DAY FOR THE OPEN SOURCE COMMUNITY AND AN ABSOLUTE INSULT TO THE MANY TRUE EXPERIMENTALIST THAT ACTUALLY DO CREDIBLE AND VERIFIABLE RESEARCH LEADING TO DEVELOPMENT OF POSSIBLE DEVICES WITH "MERIT" NOT JUNK THAT WON'T EVEN BE SUITABLE FOR THE WASTE CAN."

Pretty well sums it up!

Tests to verify these results the community will have to pay for in some way because Rosemary Ainslie wants you to "make it worth her while"

'nuff said

Anonymous said...

eatenbyagrue the new user with 8 posts quotes Fuzzy

"a infinite COP do you know what that means ?"

then says Rosemary has probably developed the first overunity device in history and everyone is jealous! "And with COP of infinity, this is not just slightly over unity but quite an invention."

Your right agrue you don't even understand what you said, ask someone to explain it to you, after they stop laughing!

hahahahahaha more than funny!

Anonymous said...

Stefan has asked her for the gazillionth time on what he needs for her to do. Will she listen? NO. She will say that it will cost her time and money and only if someone gets two academias to say its right. The Professors where she did her so called testing at won"t have anything to do with her. Doesn't she get what that means? SHE has the BURDEN to prove she has a device that works to even ask for the overunity prize money she has been asking for. People have told her where her errors are and she still won't listen and do the tests. How thick headed can one person be?

Anonymous said...

INFINITE COP what does it mean ?

Infinite COP means that energy input by the user is Zero. A solar panel is infinite COP, so is a wind turbine, the energy input is provided by the environment.

To uneducated people infinite COP sounds incredibly impressive but it is not unless a % figure is included.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_performance

A device that requires user input energy to start operation in order for it to be infinite COP it MUST be overunity. This means that more energy is output than input.

Infinite COP could be 0.000000001% overunity or it could be 100000000% overunity, in itself it means nothing. If Rosemary had actually measured the output from her circuit she would give a % figure showing how many units of energy output / input.

The ONLY reason she switched to claiming infinite COP instead of overunity is so that she would not have to provide any measurements while sounding incredibly impressive to the uneducated.

When the circuit is finally properly tested by groundloop, .99, professionals I expect it to show an increase in efficiency compared to a direct DC load, because switched circuits are pulsed and more efficient. No overunity, just the longest running scam in energy research history.

Anonymous said...

To clarify why a heat pump is not an overunity device let's use the Wiki example.

COP heating of 3.5 provides 3.5 units of heat output for every unit of energy input. Operating at a COP of 350%

The heatpump itself, if we consider an efficiency of 50%, will use half it's input energy to do work and half is lost to the environment as heat (which can be recovered and adds to the total heat output COP figure)

Heat is not electricity so cannot replace the loss in electricity and therefore the heat pump is underunity.

Rosemary on the other hand is claiming that all of the energy supplied by the battery is returned to the battery and therefore her circuit MUST be overunity. She also claims that energy from the environment is generated in the form of heat within the components themselves by a new magnetic zipon particle which is added to the output as heat at the load resistor.

So she is claiming both overunity and COP>1 via heat added to the process from the environment. She does not know how to measure the input energy from the battery to her circuit as she has admitted, she also does not know how to measure the output energy from her circuit she is claiming is returned to the battery. She does not know how to do calorimetric measurements at the load resistor to measure temperature, and she has taken no useful measurements at all, EVER!

The voltage reading she is relying on will only ever read surface voltage of the battery plates and is not an indicator of charge stored within the battery. It is ridiculous to suggest it does. She has made BASIC MATH ERRORS that she refuses to discuss that all her claims are based on, and she does NOT UNDERSTAND what a Watt is.

Basically she has never presented any evidence at all to support her claim except for a misinterpreted scope polarity, which has been explained to her at length, and will be shown experimentally soon when .99 proves it.

The longest running fraud in energy research history.

Amen.

Anonymous said...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/74884882/2nd-Paper-for-Download

Seems Poynt.99 (online alias) has been acknowledged as a contributor to Rosemary's publication with the specific implication that his simulations SUPPORT Rosemary's claim of PROOF of COP Infinity.

Is this true Poynt.99 ? Do your simulations support the COP Infinity result and did you give permission to be acknowledged as supporting this claim ?

Anonymous said...

Don't read too much into that.

Under "Acknowledgements", this is what it says:

"Poynt.99 (online alias) for his work on the simulations"

I gave Rosemary permission to make mention of my work on the simulations. It makes no mention nor implication that I or the simulations support her claims.

Can a measurement be made in the simulation that is similar to the one Rosemary is using to claim infinite COP? YES. Does the circuit really exhibit infinite COP? NO.

Incidentally, I was advised that my mention would be deleted in the upcoming re-write. I couldn't care one way or the other.

.99

Anonymous said...

Thanks for clearing that up .99.

Looking forward to your replication demonstrating the truth of the circuits measurements, no matter what the result. It will be refreshing to finally have some quality data to analyze.

Anonymous said...

And yes, Rosemary, the whole forum community would appreciate it if YOU could be SUCCINCT, and perhaps, honest, truthful, polite, not insulting, and to quit doing your favorite exercise of "Jumping to the wrong conclusions."

Anonymous said...

Hey Magluvin......How do YOU feel after being sliced, diced and dissected and spit out by Rosemary comment to you today Hmmmmmm? See how she side steps things and says she can't show the results of the 555 because it belongs to someone else? Is she REALLY being "Open Source?" We all think not! She is just using another person as an excuse because she really does not have anything. She enjoys all this attention and banter when she pokes people in the eye.

Anonymous said...

Any 12 year old would have no difficulty in convincing a roomful of academics that the only test required is to connect the circuit to its batteries and leave it alone.

It, either runs forever, or it eventually drains the batteries.

Do the test Rosemary, or fuck off.

Anonymous said...

Rosemary can sidestep and deflect all she wants. Her days of grandstanding are nearing an end.

Her game will be over when I post the video and my test results.

.99

Anonymous said...

I just love my "COLOR CRAYONS" .... thinking even a child could see the Bull Shit.

GUESS WHO ?

Anonymous said...

Rosemary is claiming she admitted her math was wrong in the last thread that was locked and harti has deleted it. I was reading that thread all the way through at the time and I have no memory of Rosemary admitting the math was wrong, at all. In the current thread she has avoided talking about it for weeks, why wait until now to make the statement, that conveniently cannot be checked ?

I think she is lying.

Anonymous said...

Rosemary says today:

"Its a pity though that we cannot get ANY oscillation without the circuit linked to our batteries."

Rosemary says previously:

"That oscillation MOST CERTAINLY occurs while the battery is disconnected."

"We have a circuit that generates a ROBUST self-sustaining oscillation that persists for the duration that a battery is entirely disconnected from the circuit."

What a liar!

Anonymous said...

If Rosemary denies she made those statements she can read them for herself.

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/600/

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #612 on: February 09, 2012, 05:17:10 PM »
TK's concerns - continued/...

Quote from: TinselKoala on February 09, 2012, 02:54:21 PM

Just show a simple YT video of Claim 1, for example: A robust oscillation that persists for the duration that a battery is entirely disconnected from the circuit.

That oscillation MOST CERTAINLY occurs while the battery is disconnected.

Anonymous said...

I think you should all have a look at Reply #611 as well, most prophetic!

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #611 on: February 09, 2012, 04:55:52 PM »

Anonymous said...

Quote from today:

"And I will do PRECISELY what I wish with my life"

A complete failure by any measure:

Failed to achieve anything more than a high school diploma.
Failed to have one person consider her as a friend.
Failed her marriage.
Failed to achieve one thing in 63 years of life.
Failed in her attempt to perpertate a fraud.
Failed to seek medical help for her mental instability.

...a lonely old loser.

Anonymous said...

After close evaluation of the problem at hand it appears "Stefan" at OU.com has given a "LICENSE" for any member to LIE through their teeth in any posting or reply at the forum.

Prior to the revised September 15, 2008 Terms of Service or TOS (6.) "Specific Use" it read ...

You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, adult material, or otherwise in violation of any International or United States Federal law. You also agree not to post any copyrighted material unless you own the copyright or you have written consent from the owner of the copyrighted material. Spam, flooding, advertisements, chain letters, pyramid schemes, and solicitations are also forbidden on this forum.

The usage of .... you will not post any material which is false or inaccurate has been missing.

So Rosemary or any member can say any lie they want .... FUCKED UP .... think .... huh ....

.

Anonymous said...

Hang on to your lunches guys and gals. It looks like we are all on another years ride of the ROSEMARY GO ROUND once again. I don't think many can stomach her mess much longer.

Anonymous said...

Its so cool to actually watch a whacked-out old woman in action anytime you want for free. No doubt her kids, grandkids and relatives have a lot of fun with that behind her back.

There must be thousands of people over the past 10 years who have concluded for themselves, the fact that she's mentally imbalanced. The daily delusions have become a source of free entertainment for people looking in on her posts.

Ten full years of spending each entire day in pyjamas, hammering out complete nonsense to no one in particular.

...What a way to waste ten full years of one's life.

Anonymous said...

Rosemary ....

NERD RAT device request ...

COP>INFINITY "YES or NO" (link)

Let the world decide !!!

Show us "Your Wares" !!!

"LIVE",

*meow*

Anonymous said...

Rosemary has now declared open war and issued a veiled threat to kill TK. It is unbelievable that Stefan is allowing this, death threats ffs for speaking the truth!

Don't reveal your identity TK, I get the impression she is unstable enough to do it, or pay for it to be done.

Anonymous said...

You can't find it TK because it has been edited but does not show an edit stamp. Post 1228 said:

Can't wait. It will be the most entertaining experience yet - where I will be able to kill two birds with one stone and do so publicly. The one bird is you and the second bird is our unity barriers. Both have outlived their value.

Now it says:

Can't wait. It will be the most entertaining experience yet - where I will be able to kill two birds with one stone and do so publicly. The one bird is your interventions and the second bird is our unity barriers. Both have outlived their value.

Hyperbole ? Maybe.

Anonymous said...

Part of Rosemarys word "game playing". She edits it real quick after a few have read it.

Anonymous said...

It appears that South African hospital records are not very secure. I received an email from a person claiming to have
5 1/2 years of documents containing the psychiatric history of Rosemary Ainslie. Some are apparently titled Psychiatric Assessment MSE and all are individually dated and signed.

That person states that they are travelling to Singapore where they will release them on their website.

Has anyone else received such an email?

J.B

Anonymous said...

J.B. (John Bedini?) LOL

Why would they send YOU that email? What has YOUR involvement been in all this? Do you have a user name on the forums?

.99

The Boss said...

And the deception and delusions continue.

Anonymous said...

R osemary
A nd
T k
S aga

N ever
E nding
R osemary
D elusions

The Boss said...

The collaborative analysis in the Tar Baby thread is probably the best that has ever been done, in any forum, on any subject.

Reading that thread since the very first day that it was opened, everyone including Stefan has demonstrated that the thesis was based entirely on fantasy and delusion rather than on a foundation of fact and reality.

Anonymous said...

Wiggle wiggle wiggle said the TAR BABY to the NERD.
You are so "Busted" haven't you heard?
Oh right. You must not really exist.
That's why RA is getting so "pissed."

Anonymous said...

...12 years of Scrabble.

Anonymous said...

Let's see now....Wilby or Neverbesober is "out of control" ( he must not be gettin any ) and Rosemary is really coo coo for cocoa puffs making up Lawyers that can't do anything to anyone no matter how hard she tries.

JUST GET OFF YOUR ARCE AND DO THE TESTING YOU KEEP SAYING THAT WILL PUT EVERYTHING TO REST.....

What a maroon!

Anonymous said...

I guess we all knew that Rosemary would not do any testing because she knows she has been proved wrong. Too bad she will never admit her errors. Too much pride.

Anonymous said...

Do you think Rosemary read Groundloops comment on the Tar Baby thread where he said he did not find even COP 1 on any of her circuits? Now will she turn on him?

Anonymous said...

BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH,
BOOM DIDDY BOOM BOOM
YADA YADA YADA YADA
HA CHA HA CHA CHA.


ALL FOR THE DOOZY2

Anonymous said...

In the past 3 weeks I've managed to sign up to a certain new forum using 17 different member names, each hiding behind a different proxy server and all just patiently waiting to do their assignments.

...you wanna mess with me, Deluded One?

Mongoose

Anonymous said...

Even with her OWN FORUM she can't stop slinging her mudd around about people. Why isn't she just doing the test she promised many months ago? She is just showing everyone how sick she is and very immature to say the least.

Anonymous said...

just dropping by to say hi

Anonymous said...

No access to your website or YouTube account?

Like I said before, Deluded One, you wanna mess with me?

Mongoose

Anonymous said...

ROLL "OVER" JUNE 1ST! No Demo is to be shown. And life does go on! Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

Anonymous said...

Rosemary really owes a lot of people an apology for all of her verbal abuse over the past few years. Do you think she will do that?

Anonymous said...

Of course she won't apologize. Even after the astounding fail of the June 29 Keystone Kops four-hour farce, and the definitive debunk on August 10-11 that resulted in her formal, albeit lefthanded and insincere "retraction" of the two bogus manuscripts... she is back at it in full form, less than a month later, with complete insulting rants and more ridiculous behaviour.
Now she intends to revisit the single mosfet Quantum COP>17 claims, in spite of the thrashing she got in 2009-2010. Stay tuned to the usual channels because the show is about to have Yet Another thrilling chapter.

--TK

Anonymous said...

Its just too funny that Rosie thinks the last comment here was 2 years ago. She can't even manuver a web site. Always blames her eyesight but its really her stupidity....She is so full of lies it is sickening....

Anonymous said...

...passed a link to this blog along to Gibralter.Makhura@vodacom.co.za

Anonymous said...

Deceitful, malevolent, venomous, and completely delusional,
nothing can change the fact that she spent her entire life
viciously attacking innocent people.

Now indefinately in the Valkenberg Hospital since late 2014.

Andry BZ said...


Thanks for sharing this valuable information to our vision.
Inverters in Chennai

Andry BZ said...


Thanks for sharing your view to our knowledge’s, its helps me plenty keep sharing…

Inverters in Chennai

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 376 of 376   Newer› Newest»